User talk:Balder - Revision history

0beron: /* SPAM */

2012-02-08T15:49:34Z

SPAM

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 8 February 2012
Line 189:		Line 189:

	Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[:Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:SpamBlacklist\|MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)		Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[:Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:SpamBlacklist\|MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	Can we get some admins who are on more frequently/more attentive to spam removal? Some kind of prevention would be nice, but presently I think it'd be easily managed with better admin presence. I come on daily and check for/tag new spam, so I'd be happy to actually have the ability to truly delete it and those accounts. --[[User:0beron\|0beron]] 08 Feb 2012

Abb3w: /* SPAM */ opcit

2011-06-12T14:09:09Z

SPAM: opcit

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 12 June 2011
Line 188:		Line 188:
	There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

-	Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[:Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)	+	Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[:Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:SpamBlacklist\|MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Abb3w: Ooops. Hm.

2011-05-18T15:21:02Z

Ooops. Hm.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 18 May 2011
Line 188:		Line 188:
	There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

-	Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)	+	Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[:Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Abb3w: /* SPAM */ Hail the Admin!!!

2011-05-17T02:14:36Z

SPAM: Hail the Admin!!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, 17 May 2011
Line 187:		Line 187:
	==SPAM==		==SPAM==
	There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	Ah! A possibly logged-in admin, perhaps [[Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion\|on his way]] to [[TBFGK_53:1\|play Sizemore]]. Do admins have edit rights to [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] (EG: to blacklist the domains [[ErfWiki:SpamWars#For_Bot_Coding\|here]]), or will that have to await the Bureaucrat? [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Charles at 22:02, 27 January 2011

2011-01-27T22:02:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 27 January 2011
Line 184:		Line 184:

	[[User:Miment\|Miment]] 23:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Miment\|Miment]] 23:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	==SPAM==
		+	There's a bot which is ripping this wiki appart. Any chance of getting a hold of Harkell and seeing if there's some extra anti-spam programs he can install or setup? --[[User:Charles\|Charles]] 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Miment: /* Places where Shmucker is spelled with 2 c's */ forgot to sign >_> ~~~~

2010-10-31T23:26:56Z

Places where Shmucker is spelled with 2 c's: forgot to sign >_> ~~~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 31 October 2010
Line 182:		Line 182:
	*[[LIAB_41:2]]		*[[LIAB_41:2]]
	*[[LIAB_Text_33]]		*[[LIAB_Text_33]]
		+
		+	[[User:Miment\|Miment]] 23:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Miment: /* Things that could use some Retconjuration. */ new section

2010-10-31T23:26:36Z

Things that could use some Retconjuration.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 31 October 2010
Line 169:		Line 169:

	:::It's a work in progress, man. Chill on it until the book comes out. Then it's canon.		:::It's a work in progress, man. Chill on it until the book comes out. Then it's canon.
		+
		+	== Things that could use some Retconjuration. ==
		+
		+	From early in the the series, 'Shmucker' was only spelled with one 'c'. I've noticed that in LIAB, it's often spelled 's''c''hmucker'. It's not particularly significant, but I just figured I'd point it out. I trust the older spelling is still the correct one? It is in the [[Glossary]] that way after all.
		+	====Places where Shmucker is spelled with 2 c's====
		+	After going through all the LIAB pages, I've found the mistake in the following locations.
		+	*[[LIAB_Text_4]]
		+	*[[LIAB_Text_6]]
		+	*[[LIAB 33a]]
		+	*[[LIAB_35:8]]
		+	*[[LIAB_36:8]]
		+	*[[LIAB_41:2]]
		+	*[[LIAB_Text_33]]

Balder: /* Glossary */

2010-10-31T08:32:42Z

Glossary

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 31 October 2010
Line 167:		Line 167:

	::Whoops. So can we take all that stuff to be canon?		::Whoops. So can we take all that stuff to be canon?
		+
		+	:::It's a work in progress, man. Chill on it until the book comes out. Then it's canon.

Commander I. Heartly Noah: /* Glossary */

2010-10-31T08:31:31Z

Glossary

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 31 October 2010
Line 165:		Line 165:

	:We were working on the glossary with a team. Did you put an asterisk by EVERY entry? Those were indicating the entries that would go in the book. :P		:We were working on the glossary with a team. Did you put an asterisk by EVERY entry? Those were indicating the entries that would go in the book. :P
		+
		+	::Whoops. So can we take all that stuff to be canon?

Balder: /* Glossary */

2010-10-30T23:23:28Z

Glossary

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 30 October 2010
Line 164:		Line 164:
	Want to double check that the nameless user updating such things as Knight in the Glossary (29-30 Oct) was you. There are some things there that add to the known Canon and expand the Proposed Canon of multiple entries, and it would be nice to confirm these. - [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|CIHN]]		Want to double check that the nameless user updating such things as Knight in the Glossary (29-30 Oct) was you. There are some things there that add to the known Canon and expand the Proposed Canon of multiple entries, and it would be nice to confirm these. - [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|CIHN]]

-	~~___We~~ were working on the glossary with a team. Did you put an asterisk by EVERY entry? Those were indicating the entries that would go in the book. :P	+	:We were working on the glossary with a team. Did you put an asterisk by EVERY entry? Those were indicating the entries that would go in the book. :P