User talk:Danielkaplan123 - Revision history

Abb3w: /* Border or no border... */

2011-05-08T00:58:43Z

Border or no border...

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 8 May 2011
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[[File:Arkenhammer_with_border.PNG]]		[[File:Arkenhammer_with_border.PNG]]

-	...is an Arkenhammer, then I'm [[Charlie]]. [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 00:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)	+	...is an Arkenhammer, then I'm [[Charlie]]. =)
		+	[[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 00:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Abb3w: /* Border or no border... */ new section

2011-05-08T00:58:11Z

Border or no border...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 8 May 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==Spammers==		==Spammers==
	You asked what's up with the spammers? Bots. See [[The Spamming of Erfwiki]] and its talk page. [[Special:ListUsers/sysop\|Administrator]] [[User:Jorgath\|Jorgath]] 21:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)		You asked what's up with the spammers? Bots. See [[The Spamming of Erfwiki]] and its talk page. [[Special:ListUsers/sysop\|Administrator]] [[User:Jorgath\|Jorgath]] 21:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Border or no border... ==
		+
		+	Dude, if this:
		+
		+	[[File:Arkenhammer_with_border.PNG]]
		+
		+	...is an Arkenhammer, then I'm [[Charlie]]. [[User:Abb3w\|Abb3w]] 00:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Jorgath at 21:23, 10 February 2011

2011-02-10T21:23:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 10 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-
	==Hey All==		==Hey All==

Line 15:		Line 14:

	:: Makes perfect sense. I added some of the stuff back into Signamancy that we know regardless of the Parson-related speculation, but other than that things look good. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)		:: Makes perfect sense. I added some of the stuff back into Signamancy that we know regardless of the Parson-related speculation, but other than that things look good. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Spammers==
		+	You asked what's up with the spammers? Bots. See [[The Spamming of Erfwiki]] and its talk page. [[Special:ListUsers/sysop\|Administrator]] [[User:Jorgath\|Jorgath]] 21:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Danielkaplan123: /* Hey All */

2010-01-31T18:11:32Z

Hey All

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 31 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Hey All==		==Hey All==

-	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a Signamancer. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer ~~discpline~~ speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to be finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.	+	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a Signamancer. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer discipline speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they are so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to be finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.

	==Parson the Signamancer Essay==		==Parson the Signamancer Essay==

Danielkaplan123: /* Hey All */

2010-01-31T18:10:52Z

Hey All

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 31 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Hey All==		==Hey All==

-	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a ~~Singamancer~~. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer discpline speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to be finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.	+	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a Signamancer. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer discpline speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to be finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.

	==Parson the Signamancer Essay==		==Parson the Signamancer Essay==

69.255.117.79: /* Hey All */

2009-12-13T03:48:18Z

Hey All

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 13 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Hey All==		==Hey All==

-	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a Singamancer. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer discpline speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.	+	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a Singamancer. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer discpline speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to be finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.

	==Parson the Signamancer Essay==		==Parson the Signamancer Essay==

69.255.117.79: /* Parson the Signamancer Essay */

2009-11-23T19:15:07Z

Parson the Signamancer Essay

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 23 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+
		+	==Hey All==
		+
		+	I guess I'm top speculator on Parson being a Singamancer. I've also contributed as much as I can to all the Hippiemancer discpline speculation, Flower Power, Signamancy, and Date-a-Mancy. Mostly because I just think they so bleep'n cool, but also from the input I've received, I seem to finding un-before-mined-threads of logic that appears to flesh them out based on what we've seen so far.

	==Parson the Signamancer Essay==		==Parson the Signamancer Essay==

Menlo Marseilles: /* Parson the Signamancer Essay */

2009-11-04T20:44:39Z

Parson the Signamancer Essay

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 4 November 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:


-	--All good suggestions. Didn't mean to imply anything besides there "appears to be far more evidence that it is true" and appreciate you removing the perceived consensus. I went ahead and added the link to the Signmancy page. Ooo, but now I reread and see you were thinking the opposite. I left it on Parson page because its really speculation about Parson and his behavior rather than speculation on Signamancy. For example, if Parson didn't exist, none of this write would have any evidence. If Signmancy didn't exist, parson would still be exhibiting all these same aspects. Hope that makes sense.	+	--All good suggestions. Didn't mean to imply anything besides there "appears to be far more evidence that it is true" and appreciate you removing the perceived consensus. I went ahead and added the link to the Signmancy page. Ooo, but now I reread and see you were thinking the opposite. I left it on Parson page because its really speculation about Parson and his behavior rather than speculation on Signamancy. For example, if Parson didn't exist, none of this write would have any evidence. If Signmancy didn't exist, parson would still be exhibiting all these same aspects. Hope that makes sense.
		+
		+	:: Makes perfect sense. I added some of the stuff back into Signamancy that we know regardless of the Parson-related speculation, but other than that things look good. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Danielkaplan123 at 14:42, 4 November 2009

2009-11-04T14:42:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 4 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~I've added this login name. I was formerly known as 69.255.117.79~~	+
	==Parson the Signamancer Essay==		==Parson the Signamancer Essay==
	Hey there. First off, welcome to the Wiki. :) I noticed you've done a lot of editing to the Signamancer and Parson Gotti articles, to explain the argument for Parson being a Signamancer. Most of that is really good stuff, but I wanted to let you know that I edited the "there appears to be far more evidence that this is true" part, and explain a bit why I did it. Yes, it's a pretty good argument, but phrasing it that way implies that there's consensus about Parson being a Signamancer among those who speculate, which (as of yet) is not the case - it's still a topic widely debated on the forum. I kept the link - that there's evidence outside of Janis's word and wispy thematic elements - but rephrased it to be mentioned as the most significant of several instead of being explicitly called "far more" than other arguments.		Hey there. First off, welcome to the Wiki. :) I noticed you've done a lot of editing to the Signamancer and Parson Gotti articles, to explain the argument for Parson being a Signamancer. Most of that is really good stuff, but I wanted to let you know that I edited the "there appears to be far more evidence that this is true" part, and explain a bit why I did it. Yes, it's a pretty good argument, but phrasing it that way implies that there's consensus about Parson being a Signamancer among those who speculate, which (as of yet) is not the case - it's still a topic widely debated on the forum. I kept the link - that there's evidence outside of Janis's word and wispy thematic elements - but rephrased it to be mentioned as the most significant of several instead of being explicitly called "far more" than other arguments.

Danielkaplan123: /* Parson the Signamancer Essay */

2009-11-04T14:39:15Z

Parson the Signamancer Essay

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 4 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I didn't make any edits on this second idea, though, and both of these are just my own opinion; I'll step back if you want to change things back to how they were, or keep them as they are. And in any case, I hope this hasn't been overintimidating for you - I just wanted to put my two cents in the pot. :) —[[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 12:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)		I didn't make any edits on this second idea, though, and both of these are just my own opinion; I'll step back if you want to change things back to how they were, or keep them as they are. And in any case, I hope this hasn't been overintimidating for you - I just wanted to put my two cents in the pot. :) —[[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 12:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	--All good suggestions. Didn't mean to imply anything besides there "appears to be far more evidence that it is true" and appreciate you removing the perceived consensus. I went ahead and added the link to the Signmancy page. Ooo, but now I reread and see you were thinking the opposite. I left it on Parson page because its really speculation about Parson and his behavior rather than speculation on Signamancy. For example, if Parson didn't exist, none of this write would have any evidence. If Signmancy didn't exist, parson would still be exhibiting all these same aspects. Hope that makes sense.