User talk:Jszellmer - Revision history

Jszellmer at 01:06, 10 February 2012

2012-02-10T01:06:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 10 February 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Your recent addition to the [[Changemancy]] Page is more speculation than Fanon, because you're hypothesizing about the powers of Changemancy, rather than creating a character/side/thing that doesn't exist in the comic but is in keeping with Canon.		Your recent addition to the [[Changemancy]] Page is more speculation than Fanon, because you're hypothesizing about the powers of Changemancy, rather than creating a character/side/thing that doesn't exist in the comic but is in keeping with Canon.
	It might be helpful for you to check [[ErfWiki:Fanon]] for guidance, since it seems you've had difficulty with this before. Another good rule of thumb is that pages about Canon such as magic and mechanics will rarely have Fanon on that page itself. Fanon is usually an entirely different page, like the example above of [[Rosie]]. --[[User:0beron\|0beron]] 09 February 2012		It might be helpful for you to check [[ErfWiki:Fanon]] for guidance, since it seems you've had difficulty with this before. Another good rule of thumb is that pages about Canon such as magic and mechanics will rarely have Fanon on that page itself. Fanon is usually an entirely different page, like the example above of [[Rosie]]. --[[User:0beron\|0beron]] 09 February 2012
		+	:Thanks for the clarification. I'll keep better track of that in the future.

0beron: /* Fanon material */

2012-02-09T17:33:59Z

Fanon material

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 9 February 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Thanks.		:::Thanks.

-	Your recent addition to the [[~~Changeamancy~~]] Page is more speculation than Fanon, because you're hypothesizing about the powers of ~~Changeamancy~~, rather than creating a character/side/thing that doesn't exist in the comic but is in keeping with Canon.	+	Your recent addition to the [[Changemancy]] Page is more speculation than Fanon, because you're hypothesizing about the powers of Changemancy, rather than creating a character/side/thing that doesn't exist in the comic but is in keeping with Canon.
	It might be helpful for you to check [[ErfWiki:Fanon]] for guidance, since it seems you've had difficulty with this before. Another good rule of thumb is that pages about Canon such as magic and mechanics will rarely have Fanon on that page itself. Fanon is usually an entirely different page, like the example above of [[Rosie]]. --[[User:0beron\|0beron]] 09 February 2012		It might be helpful for you to check [[ErfWiki:Fanon]] for guidance, since it seems you've had difficulty with this before. Another good rule of thumb is that pages about Canon such as magic and mechanics will rarely have Fanon on that page itself. Fanon is usually an entirely different page, like the example above of [[Rosie]]. --[[User:0beron\|0beron]] 09 February 2012

0beron at 17:33, 9 February 2012

2012-02-09T17:33:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 9 February 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)		::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)
	:::Thanks.		:::Thanks.
		+
		+	Your recent addition to the [[Changeamancy]] Page is more speculation than Fanon, because you're hypothesizing about the powers of Changeamancy, rather than creating a character/side/thing that doesn't exist in the comic but is in keeping with Canon.
		+	It might be helpful for you to check [[ErfWiki:Fanon]] for guidance, since it seems you've had difficulty with this before. Another good rule of thumb is that pages about Canon such as magic and mechanics will rarely have Fanon on that page itself. Fanon is usually an entirely different page, like the example above of [[Rosie]]. --[[User:0beron\|0beron]] 09 February 2012

Jszellmer: /* Dream pieces */

2011-12-21T01:51:42Z

Dream pieces

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:51, 21 December 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)		::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)
	:::Thanks.		:::Thanks.
-
-	~~== Dream pieces ==~~
-
-	For many years now a lot of different lady shoes styles have evolved in the fashion industry.http://www.penmontblanconline.com/ , What used to be ugly would become the prettiest design after a few years and what used to be the best would eventually be ignored.http://www.pennemontblanc.com/ , Thatis how the fashion world really moves and everyone who loves it has already accepted this quick change that would take place anytime.http://www.lemontblancvente.com/ , As the year 2011 starts, there are more shocking revelations of new designs that would get you amazed.http://www.uggoppstartbutikken.com/ ,
-
-
-
-	I tried to browse lately for new styles of lady shoes that are the most wanted by many and the most recommended styles in town and I was shocked to find out whatis in. If last year was a year of all the pumps, wedges and other types of heels, this time itis the complete opposite of them all ?the flat sandals. There are numerous names for different kinds of this type of footwear and itis said to be one of the best shoes that everyone can wear this spring and summer. They are designed with a feminine touch that deeply attracts every woman as it shows off every side of it. Gladiator styles that were once famous and for a short while a little bit ignored will find its way back to being in-demand because they just that light to wear and makes your feet and toes move freely. They are available in a set of earth tones and other natural colors that will please shoe lovers this year.
-
-	If you want to get the nicest ladies shoes these upcoming seasons, you should really look forward to buying flat shoes and sandals. Both of these lady shoes will not only complete your look but also give you a comfortable feel as you walk along. So what are you waiting for? Get one of these flat or gladiator footwear and start enjoying the season.

Rere: /* Dream pieces */ new section

2011-12-21T01:49:41Z

Dream pieces: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 21 December 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)		::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)
	:::Thanks.		:::Thanks.
		+
		+	== Dream pieces ==
		+
		+	For many years now a lot of different lady shoes styles have evolved in the fashion industry.http://www.penmontblanconline.com/ , What used to be ugly would become the prettiest design after a few years and what used to be the best would eventually be ignored.http://www.pennemontblanc.com/ , Thatis how the fashion world really moves and everyone who loves it has already accepted this quick change that would take place anytime.http://www.lemontblancvente.com/ , As the year 2011 starts, there are more shocking revelations of new designs that would get you amazed.http://www.uggoppstartbutikken.com/ ,
		+
		+
		+
		+	I tried to browse lately for new styles of lady shoes that are the most wanted by many and the most recommended styles in town and I was shocked to find out whatis in. If last year was a year of all the pumps, wedges and other types of heels, this time itis the complete opposite of them all ?the flat sandals. There are numerous names for different kinds of this type of footwear and itis said to be one of the best shoes that everyone can wear this spring and summer. They are designed with a feminine touch that deeply attracts every woman as it shows off every side of it. Gladiator styles that were once famous and for a short while a little bit ignored will find its way back to being in-demand because they just that light to wear and makes your feet and toes move freely. They are available in a set of earth tones and other natural colors that will please shoe lovers this year.
		+
		+	If you want to get the nicest ladies shoes these upcoming seasons, you should really look forward to buying flat shoes and sandals. Both of these lady shoes will not only complete your look but also give you a comfortable feel as you walk along. So what are you waiting for? Get one of these flat or gladiator footwear and start enjoying the season.

Jszellmer: /* Fanon material */

2011-12-20T04:44:49Z

Fanon material

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 20 December 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon? - Jszellmer		:My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon? - Jszellmer
	::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)		::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)
		+	:::Thanks.

Muzzafar at 20:27, 19 December 2011

2011-12-19T20:27:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 19 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Fanon material==		==Fanon material==
-	Hi there!	+	Hi there! You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)
-	You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)	+	:My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon? - Jszellmer
-		+	::No problem. Look at the articles about [[Rosie]] and [[Ad Council]] for examples. -- [[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:27, 19 December 2011 (EST)
-	My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon? - Jszellmer	+

Jszellmer: /* Fanon material */

2011-12-19T19:29:11Z

Fanon material

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 19 December 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)		You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)

-	My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon?	+	My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon? - Jszellmer

Jszellmer at 19:26, 19 December 2011

2011-12-19T19:26:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 19 December 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Hi there!		Hi there!
	You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)		You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)
		+
		+	My apologies. That is Fanon level material. Is there a specific template I have to follow for that, or do I just have to list it as Fanon?

Muzzafar: Created page with "==Fanon material== Hi there! You started an article about Rosie: Dollamancer and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text u..."

2011-12-19T07:20:23Z

Created page with "==Fanon material== Hi there! You started an article about Rosie: Dollamancer and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text u..."

New page

==Fanon material==
Hi there!
You started an article about [[Rosie: Dollamancer]] and put your information under "Proposed Canon". Would you remind me where in the comic or text updates you can find any mention of Rosie? Because otherwise it is a Fanon. --[[User:Muzzafar|Muzzafar]] 02:20, 19 December 2011 (EST)