User talk:MisterB777

From ErfWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Recent Campaigns)
m (re-org)
Line 4: Line 4:
:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
::::Heh.  Hidden in plain sight, I suppose.  Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide.  Your addition makes it crystal clear. :)  --[[User:MisterB777|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
::::Heh.  Hidden in plain sight, I suppose.  Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide.  Your addition makes it crystal clear. :)  --[[User:MisterB777|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
-
 
-
== Recent Campaigns ==
 
-
 
-
* Verb tension - fixing verb tense agreement within sentences/paragraphs/sections (seriously, you can't have both the present and past tense in the same sentence, folks). (16 July to 31 July)
 
-
* Help pages - pulled over most of the needed Help pages from MediaWiki and made a few edits in order to avoid creep and such (19 June)
 
-
* Klog Kleaning - Systematically going through the Klog texts and making spelling corrections (3 June to 5 June)
 
-
* "teh" - eradicated 1 June 2009
 

Revision as of 18:00, 3 November 2009

Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! Menlo Marseilles 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--Kreistor 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the Style Guidelines or ErfWiki:Community Portal, and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --MisterB777 16:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
It's on the Main Page, under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. Menlo Marseilles 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Heh. Hidden in plain sight, I suppose. Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide. Your addition makes it crystal clear. :) --MisterB777 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Go To:
Personal tools