User talk:MisterB777 - Revision history

Muzzafar at 12:26, 2 December 2011

2011-12-02T12:26:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 2 December 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Yeah, I wasn't sure at first, but I figured that, if Wanda could make one on the spot, at her low level in Book 0, it would seem to be a relatively low level spell like "hoboken". But yeah, just my interpretation at this point. Feel free to move it down to Speculation if you want. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 12:26, 1 December 2011 (EST)		:Yeah, I wasn't sure at first, but I figured that, if Wanda could make one on the spot, at her low level in Book 0, it would seem to be a relatively low level spell like "hoboken". But yeah, just my interpretation at this point. Feel free to move it down to Speculation if you want. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 12:26, 1 December 2011 (EST)
		+
		+	::Why should I? I think you made a strong argument. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 07:26, 2 December 2011 (EST)

MisterB777: just seemed to make sense to me. feel free to demote it to speculation if you want.

2011-12-01T17:26:18Z

just seemed to make sense to me. feel free to demote it to speculation if you want.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 1 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==Older Discussions==~~
	I was wondering if [[powerball]] was a spell or a magic item. I understand you think it is a spell. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:42, 30 November 2011 (EST)		I was wondering if [[powerball]] was a spell or a magic item. I understand you think it is a spell. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:42, 30 November 2011 (EST)

		+	:Yeah, I wasn't sure at first, but I figured that, if Wanda could make one on the spot, at her low level in Book 0, it would seem to be a relatively low level spell like "hoboken". But yeah, just my interpretation at this point. Feel free to move it down to Speculation if you want. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 12:26, 1 December 2011 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	==Older Discussions==
	Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Muzzafar at 20:42, 30 November 2011

2011-11-30T20:42:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 30 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Older Discussions==		==Older Discussions==
		+	I was wondering if [[powerball]] was a spell or a magic item. I understand you think it is a spell. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:42, 30 November 2011 (EST)
		+
	Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Abb3w: /* ...and... */ new section

2011-11-02T17:38:13Z

...and...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 2 November 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	::::Heh. Hidden in plain sight, I suppose. Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide. Your addition makes it crystal clear. :) --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		::::Heh. Hidden in plain sight, I suppose. Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide. Your addition makes it crystal clear. :) --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== ...and... ==
		+
		+	{{cookie\|your quite serviceable work on the IPTSF templates\|abb3w}}

MisterB777: tidying up a bit

2011-09-20T19:21:39Z

tidying up a bit

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 20 September 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Older Discussions==
	Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

MisterB777: re-org

2009-11-03T18:00:24Z

re-org

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 3 November 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	::::Heh. Hidden in plain sight, I suppose. Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide. Your addition makes it crystal clear. :) --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		::::Heh. Hidden in plain sight, I suppose. Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide. Your addition makes it crystal clear. :) --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Recent Campaigns ==~~
-
-	* Verb tension - fixing verb tense agreement within sentences/paragraphs/sections (seriously, you can't have both the present and past tense in the same sentence, folks). (16 July to 31 July)
-	* Help pages - pulled over most of the needed Help pages from MediaWiki and made a few edits in order to avoid creep and such (19 June)
-	* Klog Kleaning - Systematically going through the Klog texts and making spelling corrections (3 June to 5 June)
-	* "teh" - eradicated 1 June 2009

MisterB777: /* Recent Campaigns */

2009-07-31T17:25:54Z

Recent Campaigns

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 31 July 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Recent Campaigns ==		== Recent Campaigns ==

-	* Verb tension - fixing verb tense agreement within sentences/paragraphs/sections (seriously, you can't have both the present and past tense in the same sentence, folks). (16 July to ~~present~~)	+	* Verb tension - fixing verb tense agreement within sentences/paragraphs/sections (seriously, you can't have both the present and past tense in the same sentence, folks). (16 July to 31 July)
	* Help pages - pulled over most of the needed Help pages from MediaWiki and made a few edits in order to avoid creep and such (19 June)		* Help pages - pulled over most of the needed Help pages from MediaWiki and made a few edits in order to avoid creep and such (19 June)
	* Klog Kleaning - Systematically going through the Klog texts and making spelling corrections (3 June to 5 June)		* Klog Kleaning - Systematically going through the Klog texts and making spelling corrections (3 June to 5 June)
	* "teh" - eradicated 1 June 2009		* "teh" - eradicated 1 June 2009

MisterB777: thanks for adding the clarification

2009-07-17T17:30:41Z

thanks for adding the clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 17 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the [[Style Guidelines]] or [[ErfWiki:Community Portal]], and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 16:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		::Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the [[Style Guidelines]] or [[ErfWiki:Community Portal]], and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 16:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::Heh. Hidden in plain sight, I suppose. Thanks for adding the clarification to the Style Guide. Your addition makes it crystal clear. :) --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 17:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Recent Campaigns ==		== Recent Campaigns ==

Menlo Marseilles at 17:05, 17 July 2009

2009-07-17T17:05:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 17 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	::Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the [[Style Guidelines]] or [[ErfWiki:Community Portal]], and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 16:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		::Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the [[Style Guidelines]] or [[ErfWiki:Community Portal]], and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 16:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::It's on the [[Main Page]], under "Rules". It took me a surprisingly long amount of time to find it, though... so I've added it to the Style Guidelines too, to increase visibility. [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 17:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Recent Campaigns ==		== Recent Campaigns ==

MisterB777: signing my own talk page re: Thanks! Do we have that written down somewhere accessible?

2009-07-17T16:34:57Z

signing my own talk page re: Thanks! Do we have that written down somewhere accessible?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 17 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
-	::Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the [[Style Guidelines]] or [[ErfWiki:Community Portal]], and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --[[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/65.47.88.50~~\|~~65.47.88.50~~]] 16:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)	+	::Ah, understood, thanks for the clarification on process. I'll make sure to use the "Proposed Canon" section going forward. BTW, do we have that sort of editing best practices written down anywhere? I don't see it in the [[Style Guidelines]] or [[ErfWiki:Community Portal]], and I'm sure I won't be the only person to get a little overzealous in promoting things from Speculation. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 16:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Recent Campaigns ==		== Recent Campaigns ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 1 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==Older Discussions==~~
	I was wondering if [[powerball]] was a spell or a magic item. I understand you think it is a spell. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:42, 30 November 2011 (EST)		I was wondering if [[powerball]] was a spell or a magic item. I understand you think it is a spell. --[[User:Muzzafar\|Muzzafar]] 15:42, 30 November 2011 (EST)

		+	:Yeah, I wasn't sure at first, but I figured that, if Wanda could make one on the spot, at her low level in Book 0, it would seem to be a relatively low level spell like "hoboken". But yeah, just my interpretation at this point. Feel free to move it down to Speculation if you want. --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 12:26, 1 December 2011 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	==Older Discussions==
	Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		Your moving some blatantly obvious stuff out of Speculation is appreciated. But as a procedural thing, going forward: usually, when an editor is convinced that a particular statement is canon, it goes in the "Proposed Canon" section, which is promoted to canon only by (or with the explicit approval of) Rob or Jamie. Thanks! [[User:Menlo Marseilles\|Menlo Marseilles]] 00:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)		:Yeah, just going to back MM up. Only Rob (so far) moves anything to "Canon". No one else is qualified.--[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)