User talk:SteveMB - Revision history

Dan Hoey: /* Namespaces / /Annotations references need a new standard*/

2009-12-06T03:46:30Z

/* Namespaces */ - Annotations references need a new standard

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 6 December 2009
Line 156:		Line 156:
	Response from my talk page:		Response from my talk page:
	There might have to be some tweaking on the templates to get them to work, but it shouldn't do anything major. We'd just be adding in a namespace tag in the middle of the URL like changing <nowiki>[[TBFGK 138:3]]</nowiki> to <nowiki>[[Comic:TBFGK_138:3]]</nowiki>. So links would be updated (and the auto-generated links in the pages). So, figure a week or two of upheaval while things get moved and then it should be fine. --[[User:Ichthus\|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus\|eyeBook]]) 20:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)		There might have to be some tweaking on the templates to get them to work, but it shouldn't do anything major. We'd just be adding in a namespace tag in the middle of the URL like changing <nowiki>[[TBFGK 138:3]]</nowiki> to <nowiki>[[Comic:TBFGK_138:3]]</nowiki>. So links would be updated (and the auto-generated links in the pages). So, figure a week or two of upheaval while things get moved and then it should be fine. --[[User:Ichthus\|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus\|eyeBook]]) 20:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	= Annotations references need a new standard =
		+	In my Newbie NSHO: The references standard isn't really working, since folks don't pay attention to the standard. And even if they do, they can make mistakes that don't get fixed. I don't know how to fix that. I've gone through 100 pages of annotations, and found dozens of cases of missing panel annotation references, and page/panel annotation skew (when one footnote is updated but not copied to the other). I've also probably overlooked several cases. It's an impossible task.
		+
		+	If there were some sort of subpage for the panel that had the footnote, the footnote subpages could be glommed together in the same way the panel text is done. But then we'd need to have a macro that showed the =====Notes===== section only when there was some text in the footnotes. That's wikitude way above my pay grade.
		+
		+	If there were some sort of bot that scanned the Annotations pages for differences between the page-by-page and panel-by-panel notes, it might at least be feasible to repair the damage that we continually inflict. Again, I have no botmancy.
		+
		+	Anyway, this is raising the issue, in case you or anyone else has the chops to attack it.–[[User:Dan Hoey\|Dan Hoey]]<sup>[[User_talk:Dan Hoey\|talk]]</sup> 03:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Ichthus: /* Namespaces */

2009-06-28T05:46:21Z

Namespaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 28 June 2009
Line 152:		Line 152:
	: Thanks. I wrote an EditPad pro script that does a lot of the basic cleanup stuff (like adding a category tag to Text/Description so we don't have a huge pile of clutter obscuring actual Uncategorized pages in need of tags), so it's mostly mechanical cutting-and-pasting. [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 03:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)		: Thanks. I wrote an EditPad pro script that does a lot of the basic cleanup stuff (like adding a category tag to Text/Description so we don't have a huge pile of clutter obscuring actual Uncategorized pages in need of tags), so it's mostly mechanical cutting-and-pasting. [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 03:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

-	== Namespaces ==	+	= Namespaces =

	Response from my talk page:		Response from my talk page:
	There might have to be some tweaking on the templates to get them to work, but it shouldn't do anything major. We'd just be adding in a namespace tag in the middle of the URL like changing <nowiki>[[TBFGK 138:3]]</nowiki> to <nowiki>[[Comic:TBFGK_138:3]]</nowiki>. So links would be updated (and the auto-generated links in the pages). So, figure a week or two of upheaval while things get moved and then it should be fine. --[[User:Ichthus\|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus\|eyeBook]]) 20:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)		There might have to be some tweaking on the templates to get them to work, but it shouldn't do anything major. We'd just be adding in a namespace tag in the middle of the URL like changing <nowiki>[[TBFGK 138:3]]</nowiki> to <nowiki>[[Comic:TBFGK_138:3]]</nowiki>. So links would be updated (and the auto-generated links in the pages). So, figure a week or two of upheaval while things get moved and then it should be fine. --[[User:Ichthus\|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus\|eyeBook]]) 20:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Ichthus: /* Namespaces */ new section

2009-06-28T05:46:08Z

Namespaces: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 28 June 2009
Line 151:		Line 151:
	Steve, I really admire you for the monotonous changes to the TBFGK pages you've been doing. Do make certain it doesn't drive you insane. --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)		Steve, I really admire you for the monotonous changes to the TBFGK pages you've been doing. Do make certain it doesn't drive you insane. --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
	: Thanks. I wrote an EditPad pro script that does a lot of the basic cleanup stuff (like adding a category tag to Text/Description so we don't have a huge pile of clutter obscuring actual Uncategorized pages in need of tags), so it's mostly mechanical cutting-and-pasting. [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 03:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)		: Thanks. I wrote an EditPad pro script that does a lot of the basic cleanup stuff (like adding a category tag to Text/Description so we don't have a huge pile of clutter obscuring actual Uncategorized pages in need of tags), so it's mostly mechanical cutting-and-pasting. [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 03:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Namespaces ==
		+
		+	Response from my talk page:
		+	There might have to be some tweaking on the templates to get them to work, but it shouldn't do anything major. We'd just be adding in a namespace tag in the middle of the URL like changing <nowiki>[[TBFGK 138:3]]</nowiki> to <nowiki>[[Comic:TBFGK_138:3]]</nowiki>. So links would be updated (and the auto-generated links in the pages). So, figure a week or two of upheaval while things get moved and then it should be fine. --[[User:Ichthus\|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus\|eyeBook]]) 20:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

SteveMB: /* Admiration */

2009-06-28T03:32:27Z

Admiration

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:32, 28 June 2009
Line 150:		Line 150:
	==Admiration==		==Admiration==
	Steve, I really admire you for the monotonous changes to the TBFGK pages you've been doing. Do make certain it doesn't drive you insane. --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)		Steve, I really admire you for the monotonous changes to the TBFGK pages you've been doing. Do make certain it doesn't drive you insane. --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	: Thanks. I wrote an EditPad pro script that does a lot of the basic cleanup stuff (like adding a category tag to Text/Description so we don't have a huge pile of clutter obscuring actual Uncategorized pages in need of tags), so it's mostly mechanical cutting-and-pasting. [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 03:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Kreistor: /* Edit? */

2009-06-28T03:28:26Z

Edit?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 28 June 2009
Line 148:		Line 148:
	:Er.... which speculation? [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 10:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		:Er.... which speculation? [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 10:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
	Ansom -[[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 18:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		Ansom -[[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 18:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	==Admiration==
		+	Steve, I really admire you for the monotonous changes to the TBFGK pages you've been doing. Do make certain it doesn't drive you insane. --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

SteveMB: /* Examples */

2009-06-18T19:01:41Z

Examples

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 18 June 2009
Line 95:		Line 95:
	The current TBFGK 133:6/Text page reads:		The current TBFGK 133:6/Text page reads:
	<pre>		<pre>
-	<noinclude>{{subpage}}</noinclude>	+	<noinclude>{{subpage}}[[Category:Frame Contents]]</noinclude>
	'''[[FoxMUD]] Trooper:''' Target the [[Warlord]]!		'''[[FoxMUD]] Trooper:''' Target the [[Warlord]]!

SteveMB: /* Examples */

2009-06-18T19:01:12Z

Examples

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 18 June 2009
Line 85:		Line 85:
	The current TBFGK 133:6/Description page reads:		The current TBFGK 133:6/Description page reads:
	<pre>		<pre>
-	<noinclude>{{subpage}}</noinclude>	+	<noinclude>{{subpage}}[[Category:Frame Contents]]</noinclude>
	The [[Wiener-Rammer\|wiener-rammer]] rears up and bares its teeth as the [[FoxMUD]]		The [[Wiener-Rammer\|wiener-rammer]] rears up and bares its teeth as the [[FoxMUD]]
	trooper{{ref\|ZiggyStardust}} pulls the reins with one hand and brandishes a sword		trooper{{ref\|ZiggyStardust}} pulls the reins with one hand and brandishes a sword

SteveMB: /* Linkback for Text/Description Pages */

2009-06-18T04:05:38Z

Linkback for Text/Description Pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 18 June 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:
	===Linkback for Text/Description Pages===		===Linkback for Text/Description Pages===
	Each Text and Description subpage should have a pointer back to the frame page -- include the following as the first line of the page:		Each Text and Description subpage should have a pointer back to the frame page -- include the following as the first line of the page:
-	<pre><noinclude>{{subpage}}</noinclude></pre>	+	<pre><noinclude>{{subpage}}[[Category:Frame Contents]]</noinclude></pre>
		+	(The <nowiki>[[Category:Frame Contents]]</nowiki> is simply there to categorize the Text and Description pages so they don't clog up the "Uncategorized Pages" list, thus obscuring other pages in need of classification.)

	===Wiki Link Words===		===Wiki Link Words===

SteveMB at 15:03, 9 June 2009

2009-06-09T15:03:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 9 June 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Suggested standard tags for pages and frames. The "Summer2009" pages have one image each, so the issue of separate frame annotations does not arise.		Suggested standard tags for pages and frames. The "Summer2009" pages have one image each, so the issue of separate frame annotations does not arise.
	<pre>		<pre>
-	~~[[Category:Page Annotation]]~~
	[[Category:Page Annotation/TBFGK]]		[[Category:Page Annotation/TBFGK]]
	[[Category:Page Annotation/First Intermission]]		[[Category:Page Annotation/First Intermission]]

-	~~[[Category:Frame Annotation]]~~
	[[Category:Frame Annotation/TBFGK]]		[[Category:Frame Annotation/TBFGK]]
	</pre>		</pre>

NemFX: /* Edit? */

2009-06-06T18:00:04Z

Edit?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 6 June 2009
Line 148:		Line 148:
	Why did you change the speculation? Isn't that why we have it? I thought it was a fairly plausible notion, despite the gaming nature of the world. - [[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 07:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		Why did you change the speculation? Isn't that why we have it? I thought it was a fairly plausible notion, despite the gaming nature of the world. - [[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 07:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
	:Er.... which speculation? [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 10:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		:Er.... which speculation? [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 10:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	Ansom -[[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 18:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 6 June 2009
Line 148:		Line 148:
	Why did you change the speculation? Isn't that why we have it? I thought it was a fairly plausible notion, despite the gaming nature of the world. - [[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 07:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		Why did you change the speculation? Isn't that why we have it? I thought it was a fairly plausible notion, despite the gaming nature of the world. - [[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 07:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
	:Er.... which speculation? [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 10:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		:Er.... which speculation? [[User:SteveMB\|SteveMB]] 10:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	Ansom -[[User:NemFX\|NemFX]] 18:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:SteveMB - Revision history

Dan Hoey: /* Namespaces */ /*Annotations references need a new standard*/

Ichthus: /* Namespaces */

Ichthus: /* Namespaces */ new section

SteveMB: /* Admiration */

Kreistor: /* Edit? */

SteveMB: /* Examples */

SteveMB: /* Examples */

SteveMB: /* Linkback for Text/Description Pages */

SteveMB at 15:03, 9 June 2009

NemFX: /* Edit? */

Dan Hoey: /* Namespaces / /Annotations references need a new standard*/